Tony Bobulinski, the whistleblower and former business partner of Hunter Biden who literally blew the growing Biden scandal wide open last night during a nearly hour-long interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, has been virtually totally blacked out by a vast majority of the mainstream media as of Wednesday morning.
As Fox News reported, the bombshell interview, which came two weeks after the explosive revelations of the Biden laptop scandal from The New York Post, should have been front page news on every network Wednesday morning.
Instead, it was buried even more than it already was, which is not only concerning but it also has many critics completely baffled as to why the media — with the help of big tech — is actively censoring and suppressing the story that, in a normal world, would be covered 24/7.
“It is pretty much a 100 percent blackout of the Bobulinski story in the traditional media. Of course, there are lots of stories that need to be covered in the busy 2020 news agenda, but the total omission of Bobulinski’s accusations is curious, to say the least,” said DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall.
He pointed out what many have demanded of the mainstream media: If the story is “Russian disinformation” or otherwise made-up, prove it. Why hasn’t the left-leaning, pro-Joe Biden media dedicated resources into completely and totally debunking, without doubt, this otherwise damaging story?
The simple answer is because they can’t debunk it. Accurate stories can’t be debunked and they know that.
The mainstream media probably discovered early on, even within hours of the story first breaking, that this Biden scandal story could cause irreparable damage to the Biden campaign given it’s authenticity. Because of that, they instead decided to completely ignore the story, hoping that they can cruise into the final days of the presidential campaign without totally wrecking Biden’s chances at winning.
Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson has similar thoughts, saying that it’s obvious that the liberal media “thinks this could hurt their preferred candidate,” while pointing out that if it were one of Trump’s children, it would be an entirely different situation.
“The easiest way to determine whether ignoring or minimizing the Bobulinski interview and documents reflects media bias is to imagine if something similar happened to Donald Trump. If Bobulinski were blowing the whistle on Trump influence peddling, all the networks and newspapers would be carrying the story nonstop through election day,” Jacobson said.
Do you think Joe Biden is complicit in the Hunter Biden scandal?
100% (7 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)
It’s quite something that President Donald Trump was literally impeached because of a second-hand report of something an anonymous whistleblower thought he heard on a phone call.
Yet, when mountains of evidence against the Bidens, including emails, texts, recordings, eyewitnesses like Bobulinski who chose to break his silence and not remain anonymous, come forward with a credible, accurate and at least a partially verified story, it’s apparently no big deal and garners zero interest.
And, where in the world is the FBI?
Something is very, very wrong with this situation and there is a rapidly growing list of questions that need to be answered, especially given that Biden — who is likely compromised by a number of foreign countries, including Communist China — could very well be the American president in under one week.