Saturday, August 13, 2022

Political Editors: In Brief: ‘Do Something’ Gun Control

Must Read

FBI: Trump Stole Nuclear Secrets, Was Building LEGO H-Bomb in Basement

The real story behind the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Source link

Philadelphia police say 6-year-old boy grazed by bullet while in back seat of car

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! Philadelphia police say that a 6-year-old was grazed by a...

Ukraine: How the West Was Lost – Veterans Today

Nicholas Kollerstrom has a B.A. in the natural sciences from Cambridge University, with an emphasis on the history and...

We’ve written about the new Senate gun legislation here and here. Suffice it to say we view it as posing some real threats to the Second Amendment and other constitutional rights. Second Amendment advocate and author David Harsanyi concurs.

It’s clear that the “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act” was written in a rush by politicians far more interested in “doing something” about guns than proposing any well-considered ideas. That’s surely the reason the Senate took a procedural vote only a few hours after releasing the text, and why they’ll probably pass the bill in a few days. It’s going to take years, however, to figure out how it all works. The bill’s numerous vague, open-ended provisions will almost surely be abused by prosecutors, cops, aggrieved family members, exes, and political opponents. And, in the meantime, the likelihood that any of its provisions will help mitigate mass shootings is very small.

That said, no one should fool themselves. Though many conservatives will be furious about the bill, it’s unlikely to be unpopular with most voters. Facing a string of horrific school shootings, voters are uninterested in hearing debates about due process or complaints from some 19-year-old who wants an AR. The media, of course, will frame the bill as a common-sense no-brainer.

He quotes Senator John Cornyn, the lead Republican negotiator, talking about all the feedback he’s gotten from people “with a singular message: Do something.” It’s telling, Harsanyi says, that “Cornyn spent more time bragging about the things he rejected than championing the useful ideas he brought to the bill.” Instead, “This bill exists so that Republicans can say they did something. Not nothing. Something.” How about enforce existing laws?

On federal red flag law funding, perhaps the most controversial provision, the bill makes a big show of demanding protections for “due process rights” and against “infringement of the Constitution.” It demands there be penalties against “abuse of the program.” All of this is unenforceable, as Republicans know. A number of blue states have already passed red flag laws that nullify gun rights on the word of third-party accusations — sometimes, ex parte — and not only demand the accused prove their innocence before having their rights reinstated but allow for property searches without the usual evidentiary standards. Until the Supreme Court undoes these laws, highly unlikely, states will receive funding. But it’s one thing for California or Rhode Island to do so, and it’s another for national Republicans to fund their efforts.

Moreover, there is scant evidence that red flag laws do much to prevent violence. Most studies that contend to prove red flag laws work, do so by drilling into the consciousness of those who’ve lost their guns and predicting their behavior. The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler, certainly no NRA champion, went through every mass shooting since 2015 and came up with only two instances where red flag laws might have potentially stopped a shooter. In one of them, the Parkland massacre, the police had ignored outright threats made by the shooter that would already have allowed them to take away his guns.

“In the end,” Harsanyi concludes, “nothing will change in our political environment.”

Thousands of gun laws and regulations exist in the United States. No right has ever been more regulated. And, in a few days, Democrats will return to accusing Republicans of supporting terrorism and abetting child murder. Senators like Murphy will be back to demanding bans on semi-automatic rifles and arguing for backdoor national registries. Within weeks, if not earlier, the media will tell us that the bill was a mere, tiny, first step in bringing the United States in line with other civilized countries. For one side, the “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act” will be a fleeting win, for the other, an incremental step in a crusade to limit national gun ownership.

Read the whole thing here.

Source link