Thursday, September 24, 2020

Rep. Matt Gaetz Files Criminal Referral Against Mark Zuckerberg Alleging He Lied to Congress

Must Read

Senators Question Her Ability To Fight Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee

California Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein, who just turned 87 in June, is causing angst among more than...

How Trump ‘Got to’ Mitt: VT Publishes FBI/CIA Leak on Romney, Cuba and the Cartels

VT: Below is the story of Mitt Romney as given us by sources within the FBI, Mexican intelligence and...

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg lied under oath to Congress, a Florida congressman alleges in a request to Attorney General William Barr to investigate the matter.

Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida filed a criminal referral against Zuckerberg that says Zuckerberg made “materially false statements to Congress while under oath” during two April 2018 hearings.

Gaetz announced his action Monday and posted a copy of his letter to Attorney General William Barr on his website.

A criminal referral from a member of Congress is not an indictment, but a request that the Justice Department investigate what the lawmaker believes to have been a crime.

At the core of Gaetz’s allegations is an undercover video from Project Veritas that showed employees of the company hired by Facebook to moderate flagged content saying that they zestfully censored conservative content.

The documentary included a quote from a content moderator who said, “If someone is wearing a MAGA hat, I am going to delete them for terrorism.”

Gaetz said in a statement that during his appearance before Congress, Zuckerberg “repeatedly and categorically denied his company engaged in bias against conservative speech, persons, policies, or politics and also denied that Facebook censored and suppressed content supportive of President Donald Trump and other conservatives.”

The congressman then contrasted that with the behavior revealed by Project Veritas.


“According to the Veritas report and undercover footage, the adjudicators were outspoken about their political bias against Republicans, and actively chose to eliminate otherwise-allowable content from the platform and from public view simply due to its political orientation,” Gaetz wrote in his letter to Barr.

“This arbitrary and capricious behavior is not done in good faith, and falls outside of the express intent of §230 of the Communications Decency Act, which affords Facebook liability protection as long as the platform moderates content in ‘good faith.’”

Gaetz Letter by The Western Journal on Scribd

He said the Project Veritas documentary revealed a clear double standard, which is not what Zuckerberg talked about while testifying under oath to Congress.

For example, Gaetz cited “a corporate ruling that an illustration of a hand holding a knife slashing the throat of the President, captioned by ‘F— Trump,’ would be allowed as political speech, despite being in clear violation of Facebook’s guidelines. In this case, the guidance to content moderators instructed them to watch for hostility directed at the gallery that posted the image.”

On Tuesday, Project Veritas’ Twitter account provided what it said were examples to support Gaetz’s allegations.

During his 2018 testimony, Zuckerberg told then-Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, “Congresswoman, we don’t think about what we’re doing as censoring speech,” according to The Washington Post.

Zuckerberg also said at the time that content moderation remained imperfect, but that equal numbers of liberals and conservatives believed Facebook was biased against them.

Gaetz said the “facts are in direct contrast to Mr. Zuckerberg’s testimony before Congress.”

He called upon Barr to get to the truth.

“Oversight is an essential part of Congress’ constitutional authority,” the congressman wrote. “Customarily, Congress is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, as the aforementioned whistleblowers have done.

“As a member of this body, I question Mr. Zuckerberg’s veracity, and challenge his willingness to cooperate with our oversight authority, diverting congressional resources during time-sensitive investigations, and materially impeding our work. Such misrepresentations are not only unfair, they are potentially illegal and fraudulent.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Source link

Latest News

Senators Question Her Ability To Fight Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee

California Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein, who just turned 87 in June, is causing angst among more than...

Study: Higher COVID Test Rates For Non-English Speakers

Non-English speakers were slightly...

How Trump ‘Got to’ Mitt: VT Publishes FBI/CIA Leak on Romney, Cuba and the Cartels

VT: Below is the story of Mitt Romney as given us by sources within the FBI, Mexican intelligence and others. He is now a...

D.C. Church Sues Mayor Over “Selective Enforcement” of COVID Restrictions on Large Gatherings

Capitol Hill Baptist Church has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Washington, D.C.’s Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser for the city’s “selective enforcement”...

Foreign Aid to Palestinians Plummets

Foreign aid from Arab countries to the Palestinians plummeted 85 percent so far this year amid the coronavirus pandemic and peace agreements between Arab...

More Articles Like This

15585

Become a Patriot Join 72,558 Subscibers

Get an article like this twice a week.

15856