Tuesday, May 11, 2021

South Korea dangles $8 billion in frozen Iranian oil money – Veterans Today

Must Read

Intel Drop, May 11, 2021 – Veterans Today

VT is ready to cite, for its intelligence briefings to clients, what we now believe is an inexorable fact:The...

Don’t Blame the Pandemic for Spiking Crime — The Patriot Post

With major U.S. metros like New York City experiencing...

Judge Tosses NRA Bankruptcy Bid, Singles Out Wayne LaPierre For Criticism, ‘Nothing Less Than Shocking’

A federal judge in Dallas ruled on Tuesday that the National Rifle Association cannot use bankruptcy to reorganize in...

South Korea’s prime minister due in Tehran to discuss frozen Iranian assets

…from PressTV, Tehran

[ Editor’s note: A behind the scenes move might be in the making with South Korea considering to repatriate frozen Iranian oil payment funds, and a tidy sum. The issue has been simmering for some time with the snag being that S. Korea needed US Treasury OK to release the funds.

Has something changed? What could it be? Might Biden want to play a one step reduction in the Iran sanctions by not objecting to S. Korea’s releasing the funds to Iran? Such a fund would enable Iran to buy what it needs for coronavirus supplys and vaccines, and also the backlog of specialty medical supplies it has needed.

Could Iran then follow up with exporting more oil to S. Korea under a ‘pay me later’ arrangment where it would be building up its accounts receivable? This could all be done without any direct negotiations with the US, so Iran’s main position will not have been weakened.

Who benefits? It would be a big shot in the arm of hard currency that would make the moderate Iranian regime look good going into it’s election season. Once S. Korea has done this via a US OK, then some of the EU countries might follow as Biden wants to build cooperation bridges there, also, versus the Trump political log jam of his last year in office.

I doubt that S. Korea would be sending its PM to Tehran without having coordinated what it wanted to do with the US first, to avoid embarrassment to all. And we see this trip was not announced until after the Vienna talks went sideways with no break throughs announced. We could know more soonJim W. Dean ]

Jim’s Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim’s work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

S. Korean tanker seized for pollution violation by Iran

First published … April 09, 2021

South Korean Prime Minister Chung Sye-Kyun will pay an official visit to Tehran to discuss bilateral issues, particularly the release of billions of dollars of Iranian funds frozen in the country’s banks as a result of US sanctions.

“Chung Sye-Kyun will travel to Tehran on April 11 and 12 to meet officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran and hold talks about bilateral issues, including illegal restrictions placed in the way of access to the Central Bank’s [of Iran] resources in this country,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said on Friday.

He added that technical coordination is currently underway by the two countries’ officials to finalize the details of the visit.

Khatibzadeh said the prime minister plans to meet with Iran’s First Vice President Es’haq Jahangiri, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and Ali Larijani, who is an advisor to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency also on Friday quoted a press release by Chung’s office as confirming the visit, which is the first such trip by a South Korean premier in 44 years.

The office said, “Through this visit, Prime Minister Chung will create an opportunity to enhance traditional friendly relations between South Korea and Iran, and develop them in a future-oriented manner.”

Iranian authorities have said on several occasions that they expect South Korea to do more on the release of nearly $8.5 billion blocked illegally in two South Korean banks under the pretext of US sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the measure taken by South Korean banks to freeze the Islamic Republic’s assets for fear of US sanctions constitute the main factor that prevents further expansion of relations between the two countries, calling on Seoul to take swift and necessary actions to settle the issue.

Speaking in a meeting with South Korea’s visiting First Vice Foreign Minister Choi Jong-kun in January, Zarif added that freezing Iran’s foreign exchange assets in Seoul is the main barrier to further development of bilateral relations.

Chung’s visit to Iran follows Tehran’s release of a Korean oil tanker and its captain about three months after its seizure over alleged oil pollution.

Earlier on Friday, Khatibzadeh said, “Following the completion of an investigation into the violation of the [South] Korean ship and at the request of the owner and the Korean government for the release of the ship, a release order was issued by the esteemed prosecutor.”

On January 4, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC)’s Navy said the South Korean-flagged MT Hankuk Chemi tanker had been detained upon a request by Iran’s Ports and Maritime Organization and a verdict by the office of Hormozgan province’s prosecutor.

Carrying 20 crew members, the ship was sailing through the Strait of Hormuz when it was impounded for causing water pollution. It was headed to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) after loading 7,200 tonnes of oil chemical products in Saudi Arabia.

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT’s independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VTRead Full Policy NoticeComment Policy

Read more