Sunday, September 20, 2020

Trump Barred From Building Border Wall With Military Construction Funds

Must Read

Leftist Threatens To ‘Burn the Entire F***ing Down’ if Republicans Fill RBG’s Seat Before Election

Leftists threatened violence on social media Friday following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The 87-year-old passed...

Hillary Goads Trump Over SCOTUS Pick, Says Democrats Must Use Every ‘Obstacle’ They Can To Block Him

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent a portion of her Friday evening explaining tactics she feels Democrats should...

Canada unveils COVID-19 ‘gargle, spit’ test, first of its kind

Canadian health officials have announced a new coronavirus test that consists of gargling and spitting, according to reports. In...

A U.S. judge barred President Donald Trump from using $3.6 billion in military construction funds to pay for a wall along the Mexico border.

Tuesday’s order follows an October ruling by U.S. District Judge David Briones in El Paso, Texas, in which he concluded Trump’s declaration of a national emergency to redirect Defense Department appropriations to a wall project that Congress specifically refused to pay for was illegal. The government is appealing the October ruling.

The decision by Briones could hinder the ability of lawmakers to agree on a fiscal 2020 spending bill package this week where border wall funding is once again a key stumbling block and a shutdown looms Dec. 20. The White House might double down on its request for more direct wall funding if the transfer option is barred.

Briones found, because the administration’s actions “are unlawful and the people’s representatives – Congress – declined to augment the border wall project as defendants attempt, the public interest would be served by halting them.”

The judge said he is not blocking the president from using $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds earmarked for a counter-drug program, consistent with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in July that let the administration move forward with building 100 miles of border fencing.

“The president’s emergency proclamation was a blatant attempt to grab power from Congress,” said Kristy Parker, a lawyer for Protect Democracy, which represents the county of El Paso and a human rights group that brought the legal challenge. “Today’s order affirms that the president is not a king and that our courts are willing to check him when he oversteps his bounds.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco is weighing separate challenges to the president’s wall funding plan brought by a coalition of states and the Sierra Club.



© Copyright 2019 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Source link

Latest News

Leftist Threatens To ‘Burn the Entire F***ing Down’ if Republicans Fill RBG’s Seat Before Election

Leftists threatened violence on social media Friday following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The 87-year-old passed...

Hillary Goads Trump Over SCOTUS Pick, Says Democrats Must Use Every ‘Obstacle’ They Can To Block Him

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent a portion of her Friday evening explaining tactics she feels Democrats should use to retain the seat...

Canada unveils COVID-19 ‘gargle, spit’ test, first of its kind

Canadian health officials have announced a new coronavirus test that consists of gargling and spitting, according to reports. In the much less-invasive test, the...

Lincoln Project fiercely condemns possible SCOTUS nomination by Trump

The Lincoln Project, a conservative political action committee, joined the masses in posting a message noting their condolences for the loss of Supreme Court...

Yes, Israel should suffer a major defeat – Veterans Today

…by Jonas E. AlexisIf there is one country in the entire world that does not want to follow any international law with respect to...

More Articles Like This

15585

Become a Patriot Join 72,558 Subscibers

Get an article like this twice a week.

15856